04 Jul 2007 at 19:50
In Certification? Bring It On! Raganwald seems to think that his recent experiences with people asking about degrees can be alleviated by a new style certification.
Unlike other ideas, all that this type of certification covers in one subject.
The one subject? Testing and Quality Control. That’s right. All I care about is that if you are asked to make bulletproof software, you know how.
Inspired by the mistaken ideas that all that matters in a restaurant is that the chef will not poison you, this misguided attempt at vertification assumes that all that really matters is that “someone can be relied upon to write software that is safe”. Unfortunately, there is the assumption that someone who can pass an exam can deliver.
An unwarrrantied assumption in most cases.
02 Jul 2007 at 19:49
At a time when a developer can be called a “senior architect” with only 5 years experience, what do you call someone with 25 or 35 years experience?
Unfortunately, for the most part we can no longer call them developers, because there are few developers with 25+ years experience. Most have either drifted into other fields, been moved into management or are now independent consultants. It is rare for a developer to be able to keep improving their craft skills for 25 years because they get sidetracked into other things.
Other fields of endevour do not have this problem, so I suspect that the economic incentives in software development are skewed such that it makes little sense to get really good at being a developer.
28 Jun 2007 at 19:48
Eric Wise wants to become known as a software craftsman. His view is that craftsmen attempt to select tools, patterns, and practices and with them craft beautiful, working software.
His post has interesting parallels to the book Software Crafstmanship.
21 Jun 2007 at 19:47
Some thoughts on finding good developers to work on your projects.
To attract good developers you have to let them know what kind of application you are building, because there are two important questions that developers need to be answered about any development job - will this build my skills and reputation, and is this the kind of application I enjoy creating.
If you just list the technology in the project listing it is a negative because it implies you just want a coder to follow directions, so immediately you go to the bottom of the list of possible clients.
So to attract good developers, sell them on your idea of what you want to build. Specify the technology if you must, but that will cut down the number of people who will be interested in doing the work. You will also have to find some way of signaling that you have the budget to afford the type of people you want. It would also help if you could let people know the timeline and commitment involved - is it a small part-time task or full time total involvement year long task.
06 Jun 2007 at 19:40
It seems that once again some people are pushing to create a certification program for software developers.
This time they are promoting the idea that prefessionalism requires a certifying body with recognized certifications just like accountants etc. Luckily the author of the article is alert ot the problems of credentialism, so maybe the movement will be stillborn, but we need to stay vigilant to ensure that our craft does not get stuck in teh stone age due to some corporate welfare scam of IT credentials mandating that everyone who wants to work in It needs to know about mainframe JCL.
20 Apr 2007 at 19:45
I never cease to be amazed by project managers who give lip service to the idea that there are some unknowns in their project plan and then give precise estimates for their schedule.
It seems as if intellectually we can see that there are unknowns, but when it comes to our projects we think we are special and we can precisely predict how long our project will take.
12 Mar 2007 at 12:25
Had a fun experience today
Yes I know it is a Float, but everything else just works so I was lulled into a false sense of security, after all the other two bits worked OK
irb(main):006:0> 7.7 + 0.1
irb(main):007:0> 7.8 - 0.1
But that 7.8 - 7.7 just did not want to play nice.
14 Feb 2007 at 08:42
Ruby script for backing up blogs is here. Feedback from testers is appreciated.
Your blog is saved into a YAML file and can either be uploaded back to the original blog or a different one.
Backup or Restore the content of a blog to/from YAML whose host server supports the MetaWebLog API. (Currently supports typo|wordpress|blogger)
Script was originally created by Derek Mahar for migrating posts between blogs and then changed extensively to serve as a backup/restore utility by Pete McBreen
Sample command lines (program prompts for blog password)
ruby backup\_blog.rb username improvingwetware.com backup.yaml 25 typo backup
ruby backup\_blog.rb username improvingwetware.com backup.yaml num\_posts typo restore
(the num_posts argument is unused on restore)
Note: typo has bug whereby it ignores createdDate when creating URL, but does show correctly posted x days ago. Clicking on the link on the home page fails but it generates feed OK — puzzling — not fixed yet.
Code uses the metaweblog API
source_posts = blog_client.call(
and then saves the posts to a YAML file
f = File.new(backup_filename, "w")
08 Feb 2007 at 12:52
My interview for the Sticky Toolkit with Joey McAllister is now online.
The best question was when I was asked about changes I have seen in development over the past few years. This was mainly because One change I have seen for the worse is the habit of producing ravioli documentation… [that just repeats] what the parameters to the method are and what it returns.
04 Feb 2007 at 02:05
Michael Bolton recently pointed out on an agile testing list that few people think of
Testing as questioning the product in order to evaluate it or
Testing as an empirical, technical investigation of the product, done on behalf of stakeholders, with the intention of revealing quality-related information of the kind that they seek.
This is interesting to me because the Testing as finding defects is not very high value and test driven development is a technique to allow developers to think through issues, rather than something that protects the stakeholders interests.
Yes Testing-as-design and Testing-as-confirmation are interesting, but they are not typically the things that make or break a project.
19 Jan 2007 at 02:46
Been thinking about how craftsmanship interacts with professionalism and engineering. Real engineers seem to have professionalism sorted, in that they have personal accountability and responisibility for their work.
Software developers do not have that yet because we know that our stuff may/will crash. Indeed most software licences state that there is no guaranteee that the sofwtare will even work.
14 Jan 2007 at 10:58
In software development, the reality about what is happeing often disagrees with theory as Michael Riddle points out.
22 Dec 2006 at 11:44
A really great article by by James Bach Philosophers of Testing that explains how philosophy is closely related to the art of testing.
The quote at the end really sums it up That’s how I became a philosopher: My father believes that I must think for myself, and I always agree with my father.
08 Dec 2006 at 11:27
The Bjarne Stroustrup interview continues with a great quote.
The idea of programming as a semiskilled task, practiced by people with a few months’ training, is dangerous. I couldn’t agree more.
Bjarne goes on to say We wouldn’t tolerate plumbers or accountants that poorly educated. We don’t have as an aim that architecture (of buildings) and engineering (of bridges and trains) should become more accessible to people with progressively less training. Indeed, one serious problem is that currently, too many software developers are undereducated and undertrained.
02 Dec 2006 at 07:29
Saw a good interview of Bjarne Stroustrup recently, including a wonderful soundbite There are just two kinds of languages: the ones everybody complains about and the ones nobody uses.
Bjarne made a great understaement the average Bell Labs programmer was significantly more able than most people’s notion of an “average programmer.” Well that could explain why C++ is expert friendly.
But on that point Bjarne is clear that C++ has indeed become too “expert friendly” at a time where the degree of effective formal education of the average software developer has declined. However, the solution is not to dumb down the programming languages but to use a variety of programming languages and educate more experts.
I disagree that more formal education is needed, but we do need to develop more expertise in software development. Personally I have used C++ a lot in the past and was always impressed by the systems that we built using it.
30 Nov 2006 at 10:47
Brian Marick has finally finished his scripting for testers book now called Everyday Scripting in Ruby. A part of the Pragmatic Bookshelf the book should be a great introduction to the art of scripting tasks to avoid drudgery ;-)
23 Nov 2006 at 10:45
It is interesting to see that there are starting to be articles critical of SOX. Yes, there were issues to be addressed, but putting a massive layer of beaurocracy on top of already stressed corporations was possibly not the best option.
18 Nov 2006 at 10:39
There are no shortcuts to becoming a better developer as Uncle Bob talks about in Wading Through Code. Like it or not, becoming a good developer requires a lot of work.
12 Oct 2006 at 11:50
Brian Marick shares his thoughts about the value of clean code. He supports the idea that the Agile approches require a lot of discipline Agile depends critically on programmers keeping the code clean.
10 Oct 2006 at 11:51
Steve Yegge has some good questions about how good is Agile development and how do we know for sure about how good it is. He sees quite a lot of religion in the Agile approaches, something I noticed a lot of while writing Questioning Extreme Programming.
To date we have not done any really good experiments to validate whether the claims of the Agile approaches are credible, sure we have lots of anecdotes, but no evidence either way.